DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Haremporblape** · 04-11-2010, 11:35 PM

Young is no O'Neill.

Rush is as good as Carter or Mc Cay, but he is evil.

Eli is ok but no Daniel Jackson. Chloe is weak.

There is no Tilk. Not even a Ronin or Kayla. No aliens in fact which is too bad. Scott or Greer are ok but they don't give something different.

Johansen is a joke compared to other Stargate doctors.

The problem with this cast is that all characters are too grey and some are redundant. No strong female roles either.

Eli is a bit of a joke too. He's portrayed like a teen ager but he's supposed to be 25. past time to man-up boy!

Young is also a little bit on the evil side too. Maybe they meant for him to be a leader thrown into a tough almost no-win situation like Admiral Adama, but he doesn't come across as the epic hero like Adama.

I think they need to try a few episodes without Young - they should have extended the mutiny across several episodes.

04-11-2010, 11:35 PM	#6
Haremporblape Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	Young is no O'Neill. Rush is as good as Carter or Mc Cay, but he is evil. Eli is ok but no Daniel Jackson. Chloe is weak. There is no Tilk. Not even a Ronin or Kayla. No aliens in fact which is too bad. Scott or Greer are ok but they don't give something different. Johansen is a joke compared to other Stargate doctors. The problem with this cast is that all characters are too grey and some are redundant. No strong female roles either. Eli is a bit of a joke too. He's portrayed like a teen ager but he's supposed to be 25. past time to man-up boy! Young is also a little bit on the evil side too. Maybe they meant for him to be a leader thrown into a tough almost no-win situation like Admiral Adama, but he doesn't come across as the epic hero like Adama. I think they need to try a few episodes without Young - they should have extended the mutiny across several episodes.
	Quote