[Tilmbeinymn]

You asserted that no one can be a victim if they have an agenda backing them. That applies to anyone and everyone regardless of what the US constitution says. You are not a victim if you move to another state to target their law. You are targetting the state, not the other way around.

Someone who is practicing their faith, that's different. If the state changes their law to prevent them from practicing then they run afoul of the constitutional guarantees wrt religious freedoms.

For instance, a Christian who is killed going door-to-door preaching is nota victim as he has an agenda backing him. That's your logic. He is not a victim of religious persecution, no. But he is still a victim of homocide.

In this case, they are not a victim of anything at all. They are attempting to overturn a law that they don't like. How are they negatively affected and persecuted by the law as it stands in LA?