View Single Post
Old 10-16-2009, 12:37 AM   #5
Thorwaywhobia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Money is money. I don't see why Rush Limbaugh shouldn't be able to invest in an NFL team if that's his heart's desire.

From what I can see, Rush never made an issue of him buying a stake of the Rams. Never brought it up until other people leaked it and started getting in a huff about it.

As for 'incredibly conservative', they let Vick back. If Vick is good enough to play in the NFL and he killed dogs, I don't see why the ownership has a problem with letting Rush buy the Rams. If it is because he's conservative and they don't want conservative's money, well there's quite a few conservatives who actually like NFL football. I suspect Goodell will be hearing from them. If Rush's money isn't good enough for the NFL, then I guess most conservative fans will find the NFL the same way.

Lose, lose for the NFL IMO. The only winner here is Rush.
This is the EXACT same harebrained logic and wording you had about Balsillie and the NHL. It didn't make any sense there, either.
Thorwaywhobia is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity