DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**jeepgrandch** · 08-17-2011, 01:35 PM

Philosophical notions and scientific notions both share the problems of finite credibility, in the long term. ( Refer Hume, Popper et al)
'Anatta is reality' but what is reality; we are left with circular reasoning.
As for trees in the garden only being verifiable if personally observed, this seems to accord with Bishop Berkley's teachings.
Yes in the strong sense, very questionable in the weaker sense. What would the tree repesent to natures little creatures?

08-17-2011, 01:35 PM	#15
jeepgrandch Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 382 Senior Member	Philosophical notions and scientific notions both share the problems of finite credibility, in the long term. ( Refer Hume, Popper et al) 'Anatta is reality' but what is reality; we are left with circular reasoning. As for trees in the garden only being verifiable if personally observed, this seems to accord with Bishop Berkley's teachings. Yes in the strong sense, very questionable in the weaker sense. What would the tree repesent to natures little creatures?
	Quote