DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**newspetty** · 05-13-2011, 12:43 AM

He would be free of the desire to kill, so would he be free of the desire to eat?

To be enlightened do not mean to die of starvation. Eat is a need, not a desire. Now, some people live for eating and others eat for living.

Does anyone see my dilema here? I don't see such a dilemma.

05-13-2011, 12:43 AM	#10
newspetty Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 501 Senior Member	He would be free of the desire to kill, so would he be free of the desire to eat? To be enlightened do not mean to die of starvation. Eat is a need, not a desire. Now, some people live for eating and others eat for living. Does anyone see my dilema here? I don't see such a dilemma.
	Quote