View Single Post
Old 03-07-2011, 03:57 PM   #12
evennyNiz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
548
Senior Member
Default
Since we are not-self
Good question.

I'm possibly the only Buddhist who would say that it's better to proceed with the assumption that self exists. In doing so we allow ourselves the opportunity of honestly investigating what is there.

If we proceed from the point of view that we are not-self, then we run the risk of it becoming a philosophical stance without any experiential element.

This matters because theory (even if correct) is no match for the power of self in all it's glory. If we can discover what is at work behind the process, we can discover what the opposite of this process is - ie unbinding.

Without at least glimpsing this, how can anybody answer these questions for themselves in a convincing way?:
Would breaking free from rebirth not just mean that we cease to exist? Is living a suffering life still not better than not living at all? Namaste
kris
evennyNiz is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity