DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ThzinChang** · 05-12-2012, 03:24 PM

OT rant. I can never find the video game thread. It would be nice if we had minor subsections for literature and video games.

I've had in mind for quite some time to add a literature section. Don't know about video games, but probably will add one in the Lounge if so. But the literature section will be in the main and open as it's an important aspect of human intellectual diversity. I've been postponing it for too long.

To be on topic, sort of lol, I prefer turn based to real time when it comes to strategy type games.

If you play StarCraft II, please add me there, same username as here.

Im not going into the whole "no Negro influence thing"...I assure you this claim is notoriously fraud.

It's not fraud.

I respectfully disagree...Anyway according to your theory Aztecs and other Native American tribes shouldn't be in the game either.

Their empires actually covered huge territory, and had some important advances in mathematics. They were halfway to civilisation, Negroes never created any civilisation.

It's not a theory by the way. I'm just saying, there wasn't any Negro civilisation, and so, there's no incentive to include any Negro Empire in a video game. These "empire" games are about civilisation mainly.

This is what really convinced me of my theory.

It's not a theory; it's your opinion. Your opinion doesn't become a fact by calling it theory. Please don't misuse the term "theory".

If you can include them you can at least include Mali Empire, Fulani Empire, Ashanti Empire Ethiopian Empires etc...

These "empires" were very late in history, and they were quite small in comparison with the major empires of that time. The Fulani Empire, for example, existed between 1230s–1600s and wasn't all that wide territory wise, but more importantly, it was less advanced than the Akkadian Empire (first empire in history), even though it existed several thousand years later. That's why no one takes Negro Empires seriously, least of all video game developers.

Can we really ignore the Nubians...they were well known for their Archers. Even the Egyptians called their territory TA-Seti (Land of the Bow)

Yes, we can ignore them, because video game developers don't teach us about Negro "civilisations"...

05-12-2012, 03:24 PM	#29
ThzinChang Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 508 Senior Member	OT rant. I can never find the video game thread. It would be nice if we had minor subsections for literature and video games. I've had in mind for quite some time to add a literature section. Don't know about video games, but probably will add one in the Lounge if so. But the literature section will be in the main and open as it's an important aspect of human intellectual diversity. I've been postponing it for too long. To be on topic, sort of lol, I prefer turn based to real time when it comes to strategy type games. If you play StarCraft II, please add me there, same username as here. Im not going into the whole "no Negro influence thing"...I assure you this claim is notoriously fraud. It's not fraud. I respectfully disagree...Anyway according to your theory Aztecs and other Native American tribes shouldn't be in the game either. Their empires actually covered huge territory, and had some important advances in mathematics. They were halfway to civilisation, Negroes never created any civilisation. It's not a theory by the way. I'm just saying, there wasn't any Negro civilisation, and so, there's no incentive to include any Negro Empire in a video game. These "empire" games are about civilisation mainly. This is what really convinced me of my theory. It's not a theory; it's your opinion. Your opinion doesn't become a fact by calling it theory. Please don't misuse the term "theory". If you can include them you can at least include Mali Empire, Fulani Empire, Ashanti Empire Ethiopian Empires etc... These "empires" were very late in history, and they were quite small in comparison with the major empires of that time. The Fulani Empire, for example, existed between 1230s–1600s and wasn't all that wide territory wise, but more importantly, it was less advanced than the Akkadian Empire (first empire in history), even though it existed several thousand years later. That's why no one takes Negro Empires seriously, least of all video game developers. Can we really ignore the Nubians...they were well known for their Archers. Even the Egyptians called their territory TA-Seti (Land of the Bow) Yes, we can ignore them, because video game developers don't teach us about Negro "civilisations"...
	Quote