DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - New Guineans aren't considered Australiods?

**UKkoXJvF** · 04-22-2012, 10:43 PM

I didn't send you any negative reps of course. I would offer some constructive criticism, that I don't see Toshiro Mifune's features as strong enough to be a good representation. This is why I posted both Australoid and Siberian looking tribal Ainu in the other thread, to represent the different looks they have.

I have no problem with Jomon, Ryukan, and Ainu Japanese having indigenous Australoid admixture. I posted DNA evidence in the other thread to support it. However I would recommend steering away from the more heavily admixed examples, as well as actors and entertainers who are photographed professionally with a lot of cosmetics and sometimes surgically modified. I hate when actors and singers are cherry picked to represent a population. Many of the pics you posted are usual civilians with minimum foreign admixture and I place higher value on those than ex. Norah Jones.

04-22-2012, 10:43 PM	#4
UKkoXJvF Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 453 Senior Member	I didn't send you any negative reps of course. I would offer some constructive criticism, that I don't see Toshiro Mifune's features as strong enough to be a good representation. This is why I posted both Australoid and Siberian looking tribal Ainu in the other thread, to represent the different looks they have. I have no problem with Jomon, Ryukan, and Ainu Japanese having indigenous Australoid admixture. I posted DNA evidence in the other thread to support it. However I would recommend steering away from the more heavily admixed examples, as well as actors and entertainers who are photographed professionally with a lot of cosmetics and sometimes surgically modified. I hate when actors and singers are cherry picked to represent a population. Many of the pics you posted are usual civilians with minimum foreign admixture and I place higher value on those than ex. Norah Jones.
	Quote