DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - New Guineans aren't considered Australiods?

**somasideff** · 04-23-2012, 01:28 AM

I dont think it's blasphemey. some of the "black" populations in the south pacific( andanamese, Aeta, malaysian negritos) dont have the physical features that im talking about. those timor girls you posted didnt.

I think, it is hard to compartmentalize papua or Melanesians characteristics into one single characteristic, for example this

Some of them have wide features in reference to nose shape, and others have beak noses, and lets not even mentioned the hair texture, hair color, and skin color diversity among them such as this. Also the skull shape may differ according to the population. Hell, if i did not know any better i would think these melanesian kids were white children with a good tan.

Melanesian kids

european child with similar(not exactly) characteristics

However i don't discount your theory either, therefore it can go either way, it depends on how you look at it.

04-23-2012, 01:28 AM	#6
somasideff Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	I dont think it's blasphemey. some of the "black" populations in the south pacific( andanamese, Aeta, malaysian negritos) dont have the physical features that im talking about. those timor girls you posted didnt. I think, it is hard to compartmentalize papua or Melanesians characteristics into one single characteristic, for example this Some of them have wide features in reference to nose shape, and others have beak noses, and lets not even mentioned the hair texture, hair color, and skin color diversity among them such as this. Also the skull shape may differ according to the population. Hell, if i did not know any better i would think these melanesian kids were white children with a good tan. Melanesian kids european child with similar(not exactly) characteristics However i don't discount your theory either, therefore it can go either way, it depends on how you look at it.
	Quote