View Single Post
Old 06-19-2010, 11:40 AM   #25
EliteFranceska

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
If you basically had a list that made it obligatory to test anyone from a country's whose HIV/AIDS prevalence rate is say, more than 1.5% or whatever figure you feel might accurately screen for AIDS whole still remaining cost effective, wouldnt that be a wiser decision than condemning ALL of Sub Saharan Africa, where some countries do have alarming rates, while others have prevalence rates equivalent to Asian and LatinAmerican rates, and others to European and North American rates...don't you think you're being a tad inefficient?
EliteFranceska is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:01 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity