DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Usesdiums** · 01-09-2011, 04:12 AM

And I think the assent of Obama's chances at 60-40 is farcical and a creation of jdhill's deep emotional commitment to the Conservative narrative as supplied by the usual sources.

Are you seriously discounting my prediction as evidence of a committment to a party line because my odds of Obama's winning are simply not high enough for you???? Meanwhile, you offer that Romney would have no chance to win, saying it will "get him out of the way" and "doesn't waste anyone who actually miht be able to win in 2016". So I've given Obama a 60-40 chance of winning, and you've given Romney a 0-100 chance... and I demonstrate emotional commitment issues????? Amazingly, I believe that you actually believe that....

01-09-2011, 04:12 AM	#21
Usesdiums Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	And I think the assent of Obama's chances at 60-40 is farcical and a creation of jdhill's deep emotional commitment to the Conservative narrative as supplied by the usual sources. Are you seriously discounting my prediction as evidence of a committment to a party line because my odds of Obama's winning are simply not high enough for you???? Meanwhile, you offer that Romney would have no chance to win, saying it will "get him out of the way" and "doesn't waste anyone who actually miht be able to win in 2016". So I've given Obama a 60-40 chance of winning, and you've given Romney a 0-100 chance... and I demonstrate emotional commitment issues????? Amazingly, I believe that you actually believe that....
	Quote