DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**mikajuise** · 08-07-2011, 06:29 PM

Just that the tape was a certain brand that was also found in the Anthony home. That's why the defense tried to pin it on the grandfather. But there was no other evidence that connected him to the crime. There was no DNA of anyone on anything (even Caylee), aside from the little piece (not even a full profile) from one of the forensic examiners on the duct tape. Also, she was dumped with several items from the home - blanket, laundry bag, etc - so it's not like it could be a stranger.

but ultimately there was no evidence connecting Casey to the crime either. It could have been her mother, it could have been her father. it could have been a neighbor. it could have been her brother. and without a cause of death what proof is there that it wasnt' accidental? the tape? maybe it was an accident and whomever was responsible tried to make it look like a kidnap/murder?[/QUOTE]

08-07-2011, 06:29 PM	#5
mikajuise Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 529 Senior Member	Just that the tape was a certain brand that was also found in the Anthony home. That's why the defense tried to pin it on the grandfather. But there was no other evidence that connected him to the crime. There was no DNA of anyone on anything (even Caylee), aside from the little piece (not even a full profile) from one of the forensic examiners on the duct tape. Also, she was dumped with several items from the home - blanket, laundry bag, etc - so it's not like it could be a stranger. but ultimately there was no evidence connecting Casey to the crime either. It could have been her mother, it could have been her father. it could have been a neighbor. it could have been her brother. and without a cause of death what proof is there that it wasnt' accidental? the tape? maybe it was an accident and whomever was responsible tried to make it look like a kidnap/murder?[/QUOTE]
	Quote