DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BritneySpearsFun@@@** · 08-16-2012, 06:32 AM

Salaamu alaikum. I still disagree brother. For example, both Mufti Abdur Rahman and Mufti Muhammad Ibn Adam have fatwas posted on Seekersguidance.

For example:

http://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/...count-holders/

http://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/...ire-for-women/

Also, Shaykh Nuh Keller, who wrote Sunnipath/Qibla's vision statement is the Shakyh of Shaykh Faraz Rabbani.

Even more, huge scholars such as Habib Ali attended Shaykh Faraz's Seekershub in Toronto very recently.

So it does not make sense as to why these giants of the Ummah would associate with SG if they were headed down another path as you claim.

Brother, this is an argument invoked by nearly every deviant group, as "look, if my Shaykh was really a deviant, why did Shaykh XYZ visited him last year", etc. etc.
Haqqanis are a "good" example in using this same "connections-business", and they too may use the name of Shaykh Habib 'Ali etc..

But this is not a proof of anything.
Every scholar will be judged according to his own actions/statements, not just according to the relations he has with other scholars, and it's "normal" for scholars to have many links and contacts with each other.

You may want to read this thread in which others have used this same arguments and other brothers "refuted" it and gave more insight:

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...California-USA

And, regarding the "traditionalism" phenomenon:

The danger of the traditionalists - http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...raditionalists

What's wrong with the traditionalists? - http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...raditionalists

It may be argued that this is basically the most common excuses used to justify violations of Shari'ah invoking the "authority principle".

08-16-2012, 06:32 AM	#30
BritneySpearsFun@@@ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	Salaamu alaikum. I still disagree brother. For example, both Mufti Abdur Rahman and Mufti Muhammad Ibn Adam have fatwas posted on Seekersguidance. For example: http://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/...count-holders/ http://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/...ire-for-women/ Also, Shaykh Nuh Keller, who wrote Sunnipath/Qibla's vision statement is the Shakyh of Shaykh Faraz Rabbani. Even more, huge scholars such as Habib Ali attended Shaykh Faraz's Seekershub in Toronto very recently. So it does not make sense as to why these giants of the Ummah would associate with SG if they were headed down another path as you claim. Brother, this is an argument invoked by nearly every deviant group, as "look, if my Shaykh was really a deviant, why did Shaykh XYZ visited him last year", etc. etc. Haqqanis are a "good" example in using this same "connections-business", and they too may use the name of Shaykh Habib 'Ali etc.. But this is not a proof of anything. Every scholar will be judged according to his own actions/statements, not just according to the relations he has with other scholars, and it's "normal" for scholars to have many links and contacts with each other. You may want to read this thread in which others have used this same arguments and other brothers "refuted" it and gave more insight: http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...California-USA And, regarding the "traditionalism" phenomenon: The danger of the traditionalists - http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...raditionalists What's wrong with the traditionalists? - http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...raditionalists It may be argued that this is basically the most common excuses used to justify violations of Shari'ah invoking the "authority principle".
	Quote