DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Hosni Mubarak betrayed the legacy of Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat

**Leczyslaw** · 12-12-2011, 06:14 AM

Again, arab nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr, and they were tawagheet. Look at the tafseer of Surah al-Ma'idah and Surah an-Nisaa', ayahs 33 and 60 respectively.

Read Zainab al-Ghazali's memoirs of her time in Nasser's (lanatullah) prisons, where dogs were sicced on her, she was tortured and beaten, et cetera.

Anwar Sadat (lanatullah) was another taghoot and he spent much time murdering people and torturing and imprisoning them for calling for the Islamic Shari'a to be implemented, and then he (lanatullah) made peace with the Zionist Entity- how can you disrespect such a beautiful phrase as (rahimullah)- a phrase asking for Allah's mercy on the deceased, by polluting it with Anwar Sadat's vile name?

I would be extremely surprised if any members here disagreed with me on these points concerning those two disgusting men.

As for Nasser's other efforts, they were all failures! He was a massive, vile failure with a lot of flashy rhetoric and a handsome face.

Anwar Sadat wasn't against the Ikhwan that's for sure he said and even wrote that he admired Sh Hassan al Banna and even collaborated with him as for Gamal Abdel Nasser again i disagree with Nationalism and Socialism but on what grounds can you declare kufr upon them it's well known that in Sadat's days the role of the Sharia became more important and Sadat was known to be a practicing Muslim now i am not blindly following individuals but i am not hasty with takfeer either and i cant remember any scholar from Al Azhar declaring takfeer on Sadat or Abdel Nasser or any scholar in the Islamic world i heard that Shaykh Kishk criticized both of them but takfeer i dont know but if you can proof me wrong go ahead.

12-12-2011, 06:14 AM	#14
Leczyslaw Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 647 Senior Member	Again, arab nationalist ideology is an ideology of kufr, and they were tawagheet. Look at the tafseer of Surah al-Ma'idah and Surah an-Nisaa', ayahs 33 and 60 respectively. Read Zainab al-Ghazali's memoirs of her time in Nasser's (lanatullah) prisons, where dogs were sicced on her, she was tortured and beaten, et cetera. Anwar Sadat (lanatullah) was another taghoot and he spent much time murdering people and torturing and imprisoning them for calling for the Islamic Shari'a to be implemented, and then he (lanatullah) made peace with the Zionist Entity- how can you disrespect such a beautiful phrase as (rahimullah)- a phrase asking for Allah's mercy on the deceased, by polluting it with Anwar Sadat's vile name? I would be extremely surprised if any members here disagreed with me on these points concerning those two disgusting men. As for Nasser's other efforts, they were all failures! He was a massive, vile failure with a lot of flashy rhetoric and a handsome face. Anwar Sadat wasn't against the Ikhwan that's for sure he said and even wrote that he admired Sh Hassan al Banna and even collaborated with him as for Gamal Abdel Nasser again i disagree with Nationalism and Socialism but on what grounds can you declare kufr upon them it's well known that in Sadat's days the role of the Sharia became more important and Sadat was known to be a practicing Muslim now i am not blindly following individuals but i am not hasty with takfeer either and i cant remember any scholar from Al Azhar declaring takfeer on Sadat or Abdel Nasser or any scholar in the Islamic world i heard that Shaykh Kishk criticized both of them but takfeer i dont know but if you can proof me wrong go ahead.
	Quote