View Single Post
Old 08-11-2012, 06:09 PM   #6
Galvanoidum

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
I agree with Auzer. People in desperation thinks Dr. Naik is a master in comparative study whilst he is not. He would have no standing when others will talk about philosophical reasoning. Dr. Naik being a literalist is devoid of such deeper understanding. He is better suited for literalistist christian.
Ahmed Deedat by far a better candidate.
Also debating with pope is useless on the ground the pope is not a debater.
Allahualam
Galvanoidum is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity