[lE3l6Lgn]

His work against Christians is generally good and much better than Badawi or Naik. He has clearly studied higher criticism/textual criticism and Biblical exegesis at a deeper level than the other two. However, for fiqh and tafsir, he is awful. For example, he denied offensive jihad and explained away tafaasir on the subject from the likes of Imam Al Qurtubi etc and said they were influenced by politics! He also has denied the authenticity of hadith from the likes of Bukhari purely on the basis that he feels it contradicts the Quran (and not on the basis of the actual chain of narrators). Don't listen to him for knowledge on Islam and since learning about the Bible in general is pointless... I don't bother with him at all