DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Lxbsvksl** · 07-26-2012, 02:18 PM

Assalamu alaykum,

I think we can take the good (comparative religion) from the Sheikh and leave the bad (fiqh and tafseer). We can learn these from more traditional sources.

Thanks.

I usually do that only but after the discussion in Salman Nadwi and Zakir Naik thread I am worried. Personally I feel that I can do that both in case of Zakir Naik and Shabir Ally but the question is what about others who have not spent time with scholars or Masha-ikh? The danger is that they will insist on taking everything from people like Naik and Ally for they are no equipped to differentiate between good content and the bad content.

07-26-2012, 02:18 PM	#32
Lxbsvksl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 472 Senior Member	Assalamu alaykum, I think we can take the good (comparative religion) from the Sheikh and leave the bad (fiqh and tafseer). We can learn these from more traditional sources. Thanks. I usually do that only but after the discussion in Salman Nadwi and Zakir Naik thread I am worried. Personally I feel that I can do that both in case of Zakir Naik and Shabir Ally but the question is what about others who have not spent time with scholars or Masha-ikh? The danger is that they will insist on taking everything from people like Naik and Ally for they are no equipped to differentiate between good content and the bad content.
	Quote