DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Salliter** · 07-25-2012, 05:19 PM

Assalamu alaykum.

We salute the Saudi Wizarah for Haj for their arrangements during haj. But the discussion here is the false salafee propaganda regarding the four musallah. Our argument is that, you have removed the four musallah, (Dr Atiq sahib also agreed that four imams on turn leading the prayers is justified but not from four different musallah), but why have they retained only the hanbli Imams (and now salafee imams are added). Why is this discrimination against ahnaf and other 2 madhabs.

Secondly we are not demanding our share. We are happy praying behind the present Imams. We are not complaining against the saudi authorities. Our arguments are aimed at salafee brothers who are misleading the youth.

because saudi is a hanbali country. If I go to pakistan, wont the big state run mosques have a hanafi imaam? Do they take in turns to have a different imaam? It doesnt matter who the imaams is akhi, your their to get close to Allah and be with your brothers in faith from around the world. as long as the imaam recites qur'an correctly and has taqwa of Allah then it doesnt matter akhi.

If people are saying that there never used to be four simultaneous jamaa'aats then we need to analyse the narrations and proofs for and against the claim and so far, what narrations have been brought forward?

I find it strange that many on here have asked me not to judge sufis based on the laymen but then you criticise salafis based on their laymen akhi. There is a real lack of consistency by some brothers towards their treatment on salafis and I fear that some people have let their bias against salafis cloud their judgmement which has resulted in an unbalanced approach

07-25-2012, 05:19 PM	#23
Salliter Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	Assalamu alaykum. We salute the Saudi Wizarah for Haj for their arrangements during haj. But the discussion here is the false salafee propaganda regarding the four musallah. Our argument is that, you have removed the four musallah, (Dr Atiq sahib also agreed that four imams on turn leading the prayers is justified but not from four different musallah), but why have they retained only the hanbli Imams (and now salafee imams are added). Why is this discrimination against ahnaf and other 2 madhabs. Secondly we are not demanding our share. We are happy praying behind the present Imams. We are not complaining against the saudi authorities. Our arguments are aimed at salafee brothers who are misleading the youth. because saudi is a hanbali country. If I go to pakistan, wont the big state run mosques have a hanafi imaam? Do they take in turns to have a different imaam? It doesnt matter who the imaams is akhi, your their to get close to Allah and be with your brothers in faith from around the world. as long as the imaam recites qur'an correctly and has taqwa of Allah then it doesnt matter akhi. If people are saying that there never used to be four simultaneous jamaa'aats then we need to analyse the narrations and proofs for and against the claim and so far, what narrations have been brought forward? I find it strange that many on here have asked me not to judge sufis based on the laymen but then you criticise salafis based on their laymen akhi. There is a real lack of consistency by some brothers towards their treatment on salafis and I fear that some people have let their bias against salafis cloud their judgmement which has resulted in an unbalanced approach
	Quote