DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SodeSceriobia** · 07-23-2012, 05:24 AM

Thanks for the history lesson.

But they were called indentured servants; not slaves.

A distinct difference.........

Yes and how was their contract of employment different from black slaves? There was no difference, so they were slaves. Besides I am neither black nor white but I can still identify with the victims of the powerful. It does not mean I am a victim, it just means I am aware of the BS that powerful people spin. Today they call it Psy-OPs or Patriotism or Nationalism...it is important to know when one is being psychologically manipulated. I have more in common with the Indians in America than the invaders, I have more in common with the Irish in Ireland than the British invaders. I have more in common with the Black Africans stolen from Africa, and the indentured white slaves than I do with banksters and other ruling class elites or later day Pharoahs

07-23-2012, 05:24 AM	#13
SodeSceriobia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	Thanks for the history lesson. But they were called indentured servants; not slaves. A distinct difference......... Yes and how was their contract of employment different from black slaves? There was no difference, so they were slaves. Besides I am neither black nor white but I can still identify with the victims of the powerful. It does not mean I am a victim, it just means I am aware of the BS that powerful people spin. Today they call it Psy-OPs or Patriotism or Nationalism...it is important to know when one is being psychologically manipulated. I have more in common with the Indians in America than the invaders, I have more in common with the Irish in Ireland than the British invaders. I have more in common with the Black Africans stolen from Africa, and the indentured white slaves than I do with banksters and other ruling class elites or later day Pharoahs
	Quote