DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Shaykh Hamza Yusuf on The Ahmadiyya Qadiani

**Gazeboss** · 07-22-2012, 07:34 AM

Sheikh Hamza Yusuf is not endorsing the Lahore Ahmadis, but he is differentiating between them and the Qadianis. Quite a few notable Muslim figures such as Muhammad Pickthall, Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi, Muhammad Iqbal, Maulana Mawdudi and Dr Israr Ahmad consider Lahore Ahmadis (not Qadianis) to be Muslims of a sort.

As for Sheikh Hamza Yusuf's saying that Maulana Muhammad Ali was a substantive scholar (although explaining that he was an innovator whose books should best be avoided). it is probably based upon things such as the following,

Don't throw lies here and there to save the image of this deviant. From where the hell do you come out with this "many wrongs make a right" fallacy? Mr A did something wrong so what? Mr B , Mr C , Mr D have done the same. Your saying that Fulaan Fulaan did not consider Lahori Jamaat to be outside the fold of Islam seems to be a baseless lie as well. Allama Iqbal was not a scholar and show your proof that Dr Israr ra , Mawlana Maududi ra and Abdul Majhid Daryabadi ra considered the Lahori Jamaat to be "muslims of some sort".

Mirza Ghulaam Qadyani was a kazzab and Dajjal. The one who knowingly does not consider him a Kafir endorses his claim of Prophet-hood. The Lahori Jamaat has been unanimously declared kaffir for taking the Dajjaal Mirza Qadyani not only as a Muslim but a "Mujadid". How can they still be Muslims?

07-22-2012, 07:34 AM	#9
Gazeboss Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 430 Senior Member	Sheikh Hamza Yusuf is not endorsing the Lahore Ahmadis, but he is differentiating between them and the Qadianis. Quite a few notable Muslim figures such as Muhammad Pickthall, Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi, Muhammad Iqbal, Maulana Mawdudi and Dr Israr Ahmad consider Lahore Ahmadis (not Qadianis) to be Muslims of a sort. As for Sheikh Hamza Yusuf's saying that Maulana Muhammad Ali was a substantive scholar (although explaining that he was an innovator whose books should best be avoided). it is probably based upon things such as the following, Don't throw lies here and there to save the image of this deviant. From where the hell do you come out with this "many wrongs make a right" fallacy? Mr A did something wrong so what? Mr B , Mr C , Mr D have done the same. Your saying that Fulaan Fulaan did not consider Lahori Jamaat to be outside the fold of Islam seems to be a baseless lie as well. Allama Iqbal was not a scholar and show your proof that Dr Israr ra , Mawlana Maududi ra and Abdul Majhid Daryabadi ra considered the Lahori Jamaat to be "muslims of some sort". Mirza Ghulaam Qadyani was a kazzab and Dajjal. The one who knowingly does not consider him a Kafir endorses his claim of Prophet-hood. The Lahori Jamaat has been unanimously declared kaffir for taking the Dajjaal Mirza Qadyani not only as a Muslim but a "Mujadid". How can they still be Muslims?
	Quote