DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**sarasaraseda** · 07-18-2012, 12:22 AM

Brother, deconstruction of words that already frame the discussion isn't the answer. Because your opponent isn't going to set there and listen to your long winded academic lecture.

The "key"is to create and then introduce our own descriptive words into the mix; and thus we would the assume ownership and control of the issue being discussed.

Care to elaborate brother, i think we are saying the same thing?
Its a two part process, deconstruct and then offer the correct construct, two parts of the same coin
Perchance i misunderstood.
How would you broach the example of "infidel" in my last post, or any examples to clarify your approach?
If the opponent is not willing to listen to the meanings of the terms he relays, then thats the kind of opponent you say "Peace" to, and leave alone?

07-18-2012, 12:22 AM	#18
sarasaraseda Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 604 Senior Member	Brother, deconstruction of words that already frame the discussion isn't the answer. Because your opponent isn't going to set there and listen to your long winded academic lecture. The "key"is to create and then introduce our own descriptive words into the mix; and thus we would the assume ownership and control of the issue being discussed. Care to elaborate brother, i think we are saying the same thing? Its a two part process, deconstruct and then offer the correct construct, two parts of the same coin Perchance i misunderstood. How would you broach the example of "infidel" in my last post, or any examples to clarify your approach? If the opponent is not willing to listen to the meanings of the terms he relays, then thats the kind of opponent you say "Peace" to, and leave alone?
	Quote