DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**uwJzsM8t** · 07-11-2012, 12:08 PM

I think brother ismail_abdalhaqq is correct when he says that the JW's didn't actually write their own Bible, rather they manipulated the translation to agree with their beliefs.

Doesn't this also happen with Qur'anic translations? I remember in one post brother abdulwahhab mentioning that the Urdu translation of the Qur'an by Ahmed Raza Barelvi is unreliable because it was translated to support barelvi aqeedah.

07-11-2012, 12:08 PM	#34
uwJzsM8t Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 417 Senior Member	I think brother ismail_abdalhaqq is correct when he says that the JW's didn't actually write their own Bible, rather they manipulated the translation to agree with their beliefs. Doesn't this also happen with Qur'anic translations? I remember in one post brother abdulwahhab mentioning that the Urdu translation of the Qur'an by Ahmed Raza Barelvi is unreliable because it was translated to support barelvi aqeedah.
	Quote