[stoneeZef]

They were put into power by your same british masters. Your wahabism wouldn't have existed without your dajjal master. Really silly to potray every leader as a representative of traditionalists just because I dont follow your khawarij takfiri brigade standing at the doors of hell. The difference is that the "Wahabis" confronted the British stooge, King Abdul-Aziz while the anti-Salafi Sufis are totally silent on the treacheries of Sharif Hussein or the criminal Zionist Jordanian rulers or the "Maliki" rulers of Dubai. Why do the anti-Salafi Sufis hypocritically condemn the Saudi gov't for its treachery when they are totally silent on the treachery of the their own rulers? Why the brazen hypocrisy?

Bring the agreed upon fatwa of respected Sunni ulema representating the maliki madhab that puts takfir on ruler of Mali and validating armed jihad to replace him. If you can't then go vanish. I'm not talking about the leader of Mali, but the anti-Islamic Arab leaders, whom you made pathetic excuses for,

And there are plenty of respected Sunni scholars who put takfir on Ibn Taymiyya. Get a better example next time. And there are plenty of Sunni ulama who made takfeer of Ibn Arabi, yet many of your kind reject it and hundreds of ulama shared Ibn Taymiyyah's anti-Ash'arism and it is no wonder that your Habashi brothers were and still are stooges for the mujassimah Nusayris. Ibn Taymiyyah is a big kaafir and Hafez and Bashar al-Assad are great "Muslims".