[denSmumbSes]

Ofcourse not. His ridiculous projection of habashis is his weapon to defend his khawarij friends. I didn't say that the jihadi groups were infallible or that they didn't have serious errors, but you hate all Salafis and are using this issue as a red herring and yes you are obligated by the brazen hypocrisies of the Ahbash and others of your ilk like your shuyookh who congratulated the Nasara with "Merry Christmas" addressing the Christians leaders with their honorifics. So congratulating the Nasara on their day of kufr addressing them with honorifics like your "holiness" and rushing to make tafseeq and takfeer of Ibn Taymiyyah is acceptable for the anti-Salafi Ash'aris and Sufis? What kind of principles are these?!

"Yet his al qaeda friends were ones friends with the kaffir dajjal America and the only reason why they had the power they had. They didn't exist back then and taking support from a kaafir(America) to fight another kaafir(the Soviets and their Afghan stooges) is permissible and you cowardly refused to answer why you make takhween of all Salafis when you and your anti-Salafi shuyookh are totally silent on your own treacherous Sufi leaders.

So by his own formula his attacks falls upon himself. Only in your delusional mind. The Salafis confronted their traitors, how many anti-Salafi Sufis who love to rant hypocritically about the treachery of the Saudis confronted their Sufi leaders' treachery.

Not to forget there are no wahabis in Syria. There are lots of Salafis in Syria and even Ash'ari and Sufi shuyookh like Sabuni and Yacoubi are collaborating with the Salafis in the fight against Bashar.

His attempt to associate his khawarij brigade with them is futile too. We have seen how salafis reacted in Egypt. Two faced farce.