DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**YonkFiorc** · 07-14-2008, 08:33 PM

Originally posted by Sprayber
We did it once but do we still have the fire or the cause for revolution. Times aren't good but not bad enough for revolution as it is, but what would it take to shift us to that point or are we all too comfortable and afraid of losing what we have to get to that point. Commies talk about it as they sip on their coffee and young people sport anarchy logos on their T-shirts but I don't expect much from them. Wouldn't you need some kind of real (like: better) alternative to what you have now for a rev, and that most people agree on this as a good idea?

Also, are we speaking about a real rev (incl use of force) or some girly non-violent rev like the one Tehban spoke about. Or like the non-violent changes in Eastern Europe incl EastKrautland done mostly without putting people against the wall.

07-14-2008, 08:33 PM	#8
YonkFiorc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 425 Senior Member	Originally posted by Sprayber We did it once but do we still have the fire or the cause for revolution. Times aren't good but not bad enough for revolution as it is, but what would it take to shift us to that point or are we all too comfortable and afraid of losing what we have to get to that point. Commies talk about it as they sip on their coffee and young people sport anarchy logos on their T-shirts but I don't expect much from them. Wouldn't you need some kind of real (like: better) alternative to what you have now for a rev, and that most people agree on this as a good idea? Also, are we speaking about a real rev (incl use of force) or some girly non-violent rev like the one Tehban spoke about. Or like the non-violent changes in Eastern Europe incl EastKrautland done mostly without putting people against the wall.
	Quote