DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**V8V8V8** · 06-18-2008, 02:55 PM

Negligence is irrelevant. Steves house was not hit by lightning, it was destroyed by Bobs tree. If lightning hit Bobs tree and felled it onto Steves house there would also be no negligence but Bob would still have liability since his tree destroyed Steves house.

06-18-2008, 02:55 PM	#8
V8V8V8 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 603 Senior Member	Negligence is irrelevant. Steves house was not hit by lightning, it was destroyed by Bobs tree. If lightning hit Bobs tree and felled it onto Steves house there would also be no negligence but Bob would still have liability since his tree destroyed Steves house.
	Quote