DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - CanPol

**barsikjal** · 06-15-2008, 11:03 PM

Originally posted by Mr Snuggles

That's a **** article, because the policy of FuelCast (even before this) was not to air political ads. The article makes it sounds like it was outrage from idiots that caused the change. You're just upset you won't be hearing the Tory message.

It's also **** because it says the taxpayers will be funding the ads, when they are funded 100% by private contributors to the conservative party. Not exactly. You do know some party funds come from the public purse now?

06-15-2008, 11:03 PM	#21
barsikjal Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 484 Senior Member	Originally posted by Mr Snuggles That's a ** article, because the policy of FuelCast (even before this) was not to air political ads. The article makes it sounds like it was outrage from idiots that caused the change. You're just upset you won't be hearing the Tory message. It's also ** because it says the taxpayers will be funding the ads, when they are funded 100% by private contributors to the conservative party. Not exactly. You do know some party funds come from the public purse now?
	Quote