DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CathBraun** · 04-07-2008, 08:55 PM

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
I read your Derbyshire quote. And responded to it. Picking and choosing when to apply skepticism to change is not a political philosophy I find compelling. Especially when the "change" you're arguing against is actually the norm for American history. I have to apologize, then, as I did not see a post from you indicating why you thought that the benefits of mass immigration outweighed potential social costs. Is Derbyshire right when he contends that mass immigration is one giant social engineering project? Would you say that he is wrong by saying that he does not want to be forced to be a part of this project?

(EDIT: VJ made similar points.)

And, of course YOU do not have to find Conservatism compelling in the least! But, you did ask the question, and this is the answer.

04-07-2008, 08:55 PM	#25
CathBraun Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 502 Senior Member	Originally posted by KrazyHorse I read your Derbyshire quote. And responded to it. Picking and choosing when to apply skepticism to change is not a political philosophy I find compelling. Especially when the "change" you're arguing against is actually the norm for American history. I have to apologize, then, as I did not see a post from you indicating why you thought that the benefits of mass immigration outweighed potential social costs. Is Derbyshire right when he contends that mass immigration is one giant social engineering project? Would you say that he is wrong by saying that he does not want to be forced to be a part of this project? (EDIT: VJ made similar points.) And, of course YOU do not have to find Conservatism compelling in the least! But, you did ask the question, and this is the answer.
	Quote