DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**WaydayFep** · 12-06-2007, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by Wezil If you think I'm a fan of censorship you are sadly mistaken. I'm libertarian. People here get offended so easily.

I never implied you were a fan of censorship. I only said that what you were proposing was censorship.

I guess I'll note your political affiliation 'coming out' post although I honestly don't see why you felt it was necessary.

[SIZE=1] I don't have an issue with reporting the crime but I do have an issue with giving the named individual notoriety. Will your knowledge of the "facts" be impaired b/c you don't know his name? How does this tidbit help you "understand"?

Name the victims, let the shooter remain now and forever - anonymous. Who said I sought "understanding"?

Even if that's what I wanted why should that be anyone's business but mine?

The shooter's name is one of the facts of the case. Not reporting it is still censorship.

12-06-2007, 07:16 PM	#12
WaydayFep Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	Originally posted by Wezil If you think I'm a fan of censorship you are sadly mistaken. I'm libertarian. People here get offended so easily. I never implied you were a fan of censorship. I only said that what you were proposing was censorship. I guess I'll note your political affiliation 'coming out' post although I honestly don't see why you felt it was necessary. [SIZE=1] I don't have an issue with reporting the crime but I do have an issue with giving the named individual notoriety. Will your knowledge of the "facts" be impaired b/c you don't know his name? How does this tidbit help you "understand"? Name the victims, let the shooter remain now and forever - anonymous. Who said I sought "understanding"? Even if that's what I wanted why should that be anyone's business but mine? The shooter's name is one of the facts of the case. Not reporting it is still censorship.
	Quote