DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Adverse Possession: Emininent domain's evil twin brother?

**LindaSmithIV** · 12-04-2007, 12:56 AM

Originally posted by snoopy369 ... but Uberloz, an easement is an entirely reasonable resolution to the theoretical problem here. It is not as black and white as you have been portraying it. I totally get that.

I think I was editing the post you are referring to here as you were typing yours.

I could see the use of an easement to satisfy all parties here if the original owners were in favor of it. I just don't see the use of adverse possesion as being applicable.

I also don't like the whole idea of adverse possesion to begin with.

But then I've never been in favor of forced redistribution in any form.

12-04-2007, 12:56 AM	#19
LindaSmithIV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 351 Senior Member	Originally posted by snoopy369 ... but Uberloz, an easement is an entirely reasonable resolution to the theoretical problem here. It is not as black and white as you have been portraying it. I totally get that. I think I was editing the post you are referring to here as you were typing yours. I could see the use of an easement to satisfy all parties here if the original owners were in favor of it. I just don't see the use of adverse possesion as being applicable. I also don't like the whole idea of adverse possesion to begin with. But then I've never been in favor of forced redistribution in any form.
	Quote