DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Knillagrarp** · 07-27-2007, 09:53 PM

Um...

Actually I think it's pretty clear that Lonestar is considering the "next war" as much as that is possible (difficult to see - always in motion is the future).

Carriers give us highly mobile firepower. When the enemy is not a powerful nation state but rather a shadowy group hiding out in some remote spot, that remains useful.

What would be silly, IMO, would be investing a shitload of money in, say, a brand new Tank. Or a bunch of nuclear submarines...

-Arrian

07-27-2007, 09:53 PM	#22
Knillagrarp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	Um... Actually I think it's pretty clear that Lonestar is considering the "next war" as much as that is possible (difficult to see - always in motion is the future). Carriers give us highly mobile firepower. When the enemy is not a powerful nation state but rather a shadowy group hiding out in some remote spot, that remains useful. What would be silly, IMO, would be investing a shitload of money in, say, a brand new Tank. Or a bunch of nuclear submarines... -Arrian
	Quote