DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**hhynmtrxcp** · 08-16-2012, 04:10 PM

yeah, there are some A-grade truthers like ZCF who I've heard recently on podcasts & such, talking about a "litmus test" for whether a truther (one who has some sort of platform... blog, podcast, book(s) etc)- where the question is, where do they stand on the 2 great zio-nwo-facilitating hoaxes of out era, the holohoax & the warrenterra hoax/911. If they're not on the right side of both, then they're a fraud.

Many 911 truthers also profess holocaustianity. Kevin Barrett comes to mind. Check this post/podcast from the holohoax thread: Kollerstom is an articulate 9/11, 7/7, & holohoax truther. He's an English uni prof who was abruptly fired when he let his holohoax views be known, and also the UK 9/11-7/7 truth groups didn't want him around (at least their ahem "leadership" that is). This is the dilemma which the dual-truthers are in, and why I figure Barrett (and Fetzer, few posts down from the above liink) publicly professes a general belief in the holohoax (IE he "Claps For Tinkerbell"), while also blurring things a bit by allowing the possibility that the numbers (Six Million™) "may be off", and professes belief that no one should be persecuted for asking questions.

Barrett is way too smart not to see the holohoax for what it is; he just plays a "political strategy" by staying coy about his position on it.

But guys like ZCF are cracking the whip, saying no more clapping for Tinkerbell... well ZCF is 22yo, brilliant but young, and his over-zeal often comes through in his impatience & bluntness.

"Barrett is way too smart not to see the holohoax for what it is; he just plays a "political strategy" by staying coy about his position on it. "

I guess I am just getting to be a bit more and ornery as I get older but the folks cherry picking what truth to let out really gives me a bad taste these days. So-and-So is great at discussing banking scandals (Matt Taibi for ex) and will build a following because the info that is let out is just so tasty! Then later we find out So-and-So is really just another pied piper.

Time is getting less by the day before it call comes down (doom is only 6 months away afterall

) and sometimes I wonder how much good selective truth is going to do, and I think 'not much good' is the answer. As hoarder wrote above, it is all connected.

Striking the root requires a certain level of political incorrectness.

08-16-2012, 04:10 PM	#13
hhynmtrxcp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	yeah, there are some A-grade truthers like ZCF who I've heard recently on podcasts & such, talking about a "litmus test" for whether a truther (one who has some sort of platform... blog, podcast, book(s) etc)- where the question is, where do they stand on the 2 great zio-nwo-facilitating hoaxes of out era, the holohoax & the warrenterra hoax/911. If they're not on the right side of both, then they're a fraud. Many 911 truthers also profess holocaustianity. Kevin Barrett comes to mind. Check this post/podcast from the holohoax thread: Kollerstom is an articulate 9/11, 7/7, & holohoax truther. He's an English uni prof who was abruptly fired when he let his holohoax views be known, and also the UK 9/11-7/7 truth groups didn't want him around (at least their ahem "leadership" that is). This is the dilemma which the dual-truthers are in, and why I figure Barrett (and Fetzer, few posts down from the above liink) publicly professes a general belief in the holohoax (IE he "Claps For Tinkerbell"), while also blurring things a bit by allowing the possibility that the numbers (Six Million™) "may be off", and professes belief that no one should be persecuted for asking questions. Barrett is way too smart not to see the holohoax for what it is; he just plays a "political strategy" by staying coy about his position on it. But guys like ZCF are cracking the whip, saying no more clapping for Tinkerbell... well ZCF is 22yo, brilliant but young, and his over-zeal often comes through in his impatience & bluntness. "Barrett is way too smart not to see the holohoax for what it is; he just plays a "political strategy" by staying coy about his position on it. " I guess I am just getting to be a bit more and ornery as I get older but the folks cherry picking what truth to let out really gives me a bad taste these days. So-and-So is great at discussing banking scandals (Matt Taibi for ex) and will build a following because the info that is let out is just so tasty! Then later we find out So-and-So is really just another pied piper. Time is getting less by the day before it call comes down (doom is only 6 months away afterall ) and sometimes I wonder how much good selective truth is going to do, and I think 'not much good' is the answer. As hoarder wrote above, it is all connected. Striking the root requires a certain level of political incorrectness.
	Quote