DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**teergoBissono** · 05-21-2007, 10:50 PM

I don't get the equality thing either. We should be equal when it comes to rating our performance. Performance counts, not what attributes you have or don't have.

That is, this directly would imply, that someone is worth less. I don't agree with it. Should we also not hire women because they are likely to become pregnant, and that's just not going to profit the business as much a man who can't become pregnant?

Then again, I don't think child care benefits etc are tools to deprive the other man from his salary, so no, I don't think this is an issue of equality. But generally, yes, Oerdin is equal to the man with a kid in the working place.

It's not even true that married men are more trustworthy or what ever productive. There are bunch of dads who are *******s. Even cockroaches have kids. Most people over 40 are parents. There are lots of stupid ****ing idiots aged 40 or more.

Plus, some jobs and companies would consider family as something that is hindering the employee. If you have to move a lot, if you have to put in a lot of hours. If you need to be ambitious and go crack those skulls.. a family man will have other things to do. Where's the production in that? There is none. It's the guys who stay and do the extra hours because others couldn't get in. They are the ones sacrificing, becuase family guys have 'more valuable free time'.

So no, I disagree with the whole notion of it. Everyone should be treated equally. I think this should be trivial in the 21st century.

05-21-2007, 10:50 PM	#17
teergoBissono Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	I don't get the equality thing either. We should be equal when it comes to rating our performance. Performance counts, not what attributes you have or don't have. That is, this directly would imply, that someone is worth less. I don't agree with it. Should we also not hire women because they are likely to become pregnant, and that's just not going to profit the business as much a man who can't become pregnant? Then again, I don't think child care benefits etc are tools to deprive the other man from his salary, so no, I don't think this is an issue of equality. But generally, yes, Oerdin is equal to the man with a kid in the working place. It's not even true that married men are more trustworthy or what ever productive. There are bunch of dads who are *****s. Even cockroaches have kids. Most people over 40 are parents. There are lots of stupid **ing idiots aged 40 or more. Plus, some jobs and companies would consider family as something that is hindering the employee. If you have to move a lot, if you have to put in a lot of hours. If you need to be ambitious and go crack those skulls.. a family man will have other things to do. Where's the production in that? There is none. It's the guys who stay and do the extra hours because others couldn't get in. They are the ones sacrificing, becuase family guys have 'more valuable free time'. So no, I disagree with the whole notion of it. Everyone should be treated equally. I think this should be trivial in the 21st century.
	Quote