View Single Post
Old 11-14-2006, 11:31 PM   #30
Zhgpavye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by C0ckney
to clear one or two things up about english law regarding defamation. the burden of proof is on the accused, but there are good reasons behind this. the accuser must prove that the accused has published statements which defame a named or identifiable individual, or individuals in a manner which causes them loss in their trade or profession, or causes a reasonable person to think worse of him, her or them. So what? If the person is a public figure (esp. a politician), and it's true, then good for the person who defamed him
Zhgpavye is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity