Thread
:
your local sidereal time
View Single Post
09-23-2007, 02:13 AM
#
5
FUNALA
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
hi everyone.
brent, i have the same question as you. here's what i think after also doing some research on local sidereal time (lst):
1) in my humble opinion, the best website to calculate your lst is
www.tycho.usno.navy.mil/sidereal.htm
2) i think but am not sure, that to figure out 14 hrs. and 30 min. of your lst one should do the following: go to the above link, type in your city/state; once you get your lst displayed, figure out how many hours and minutes to add or subtract to your lst to get it to read 14:30. make same adjustment to "real" time on time display of your computer (or another reliable timekeeper). this "real" time should then be the time when your esp abilities will be their greatest.
for those not familiar, let me quote david wilcock from his blog post "david on odyssey radio -- transcript!"
dw: "look for fourteen hours and thirty minutes of your local sidereal time. that's when your psychic ability will be the strongest, because you're in alignment with the galactic center. [it does shift slightly each day, so you have to keep checking if you want to work with this concept.]" (end quote
i scanned the paper brent mentioned in his posting, located at
www.jsasoc.com/docs/jse-lst.pdf
. the following quote should explain the slight shift described above.
"at any given point on the earth's surface the stars return to their same positions after one sidereal day has elapsed, this day being approximately 3' 56" shorter than a solar day." [that is, about 4 minutes shorter] (end quote)
the following sentence is given a footnote which follows:
"the ordinary 24-hour day is slightly longer than the sidereal day owing to the revolution of the earth around the sun in the same direction as the daily rotation of the earth. the earth must rotate a little more to bring the sun back overhead from one noon to the next since the sun has advanced slightly with respect to the stars in the course of a day...." (end quote)
in the introduction of that paper, the author states the "effect size increase" took place within 1 hour of 13.5 h lst, rather than 14.5 h lst, as david wilcock states. i'm wondering if this is an error or did i not read far enough? i certainly mean no offense toward mr. wilcock, just wondering about the difference.
i hope i have not provided any inaccurate information, especially in my statement 2 above. if anyone knows for sure and/or can explain it better, please do so.
thanks!
lots of light,
doug
Quote
FUNALA
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by FUNALA
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
01:19 AM
.