DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Anyone Want To Help Unify All Concepts, Densities, Timelines, Practices and Energy?

**BigBobdd** · 09-24-2011, 05:06 AM

thanks for the in depth response

why is it not best to think of it empty? is there a measurable value in proceeding this way? if so tell me how or why. you say it is just space or with no mass or antimatter mass. if there is no mass how could it not be empty, if it is space or antimatter where do they come from and where does the thing it comes from come from so on and so fourth? i tried to explain this as best i could but its not easy to grasp even though i understand it. the reason its not empty is because its only the space where mass isnt. since mass has condensed creating space, its still equal to mass because our condensed mass exists.

basicly if gravity didnt exist the mass would encompass the space, making space/mass and not space/time "distance". if it was empty mass could have no boundry for existance within that field, but mass can traverse all space as well as energy. an example is a lightbulb, if the energy couldnt be condensed through the filament no light would occur. in the scenerio of space/mass even the thought of electricity would be rediculous, because there would be a seperation in the mass and energy within the space. the seperation would be a distance and thus creating space/time, when before it had been all-united.

-what do you mean by you have to go through all the ropes? one of the intentions of this thread is to allow people to understand such a thing if it is found even if it takes them time. if they don't want to understand it or cannot understand it i don't think there is a problem with that. i also have no value for belief personally, i don't mind if people believe things i see possibilities. holding a belief takes up to much room for me so i have no value having them because it serves no purpose to me. - i agree a noble cause which is why i offered my suggestion of precaution "which is what my orginal post intended". im not saying you dont understand or you cant understand, infact i think you understand things very well. this isnt a belief but based off scientific proof and physics theory.

for me to understand those 3 symbols the way i do today was a 20 year growing process. where as i have reduced the connections alot, i still wouldnt have been able to reply to this thread with a simple "o" as my post. i had to fill those gaps, or rather "put you through the ropes". not so you could think what i want you to, but to show you what im talking about when it comes to simplifying a multitude and then getting that to connect to others.

09-24-2011, 05:06 AM	#30
BigBobdd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 328 Senior Member	thanks for the in depth response why is it not best to think of it empty? is there a measurable value in proceeding this way? if so tell me how or why. you say it is just space or with no mass or antimatter mass. if there is no mass how could it not be empty, if it is space or antimatter where do they come from and where does the thing it comes from come from so on and so fourth? i tried to explain this as best i could but its not easy to grasp even though i understand it. the reason its not empty is because its only the space where mass isnt. since mass has condensed creating space, its still equal to mass because our condensed mass exists. basicly if gravity didnt exist the mass would encompass the space, making space/mass and not space/time "distance". if it was empty mass could have no boundry for existance within that field, but mass can traverse all space as well as energy. an example is a lightbulb, if the energy couldnt be condensed through the filament no light would occur. in the scenerio of space/mass even the thought of electricity would be rediculous, because there would be a seperation in the mass and energy within the space. the seperation would be a distance and thus creating space/time, when before it had been all-united. -what do you mean by you have to go through all the ropes? one of the intentions of this thread is to allow people to understand such a thing if it is found even if it takes them time. if they don't want to understand it or cannot understand it i don't think there is a problem with that. i also have no value for belief personally, i don't mind if people believe things i see possibilities. holding a belief takes up to much room for me so i have no value having them because it serves no purpose to me. - i agree a noble cause which is why i offered my suggestion of precaution "which is what my orginal post intended". im not saying you dont understand or you cant understand, infact i think you understand things very well. this isnt a belief but based off scientific proof and physics theory. for me to understand those 3 symbols the way i do today was a 20 year growing process. where as i have reduced the connections alot, i still wouldnt have been able to reply to this thread with a simple "o" as my post. i had to fill those gaps, or rather "put you through the ropes". not so you could think what i want you to, but to show you what im talking about when it comes to simplifying a multitude and then getting that to connect to others.
	Quote