View Single Post
Old 09-24-2011, 05:24 AM   #31
R1king

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
-i have no problem with explaining interaction of matter i think energy (regardless if it is in form or not and regardless if it is moving or not) has to always be in existence and would think if there was no energy such a thing as the big bang if true could have never happened. in a way i have to agree because it cannot be created nor destroyed. however it can transfer. energy wouldnt be able to just "not exist", but if space/mass existed as our reality mass would be energy. rather they would be one in the same, like manergy or something. it couldnt be called energy but it couldnt be called not energy either. those two elements alone would envelop all of space in one unity, eliminating time (distance).

or another way to see no time is: there is no distance. so even if you moved, it would be the same thing. as would the next move, and so on for eternity only to result in the same space with nothing having moved. ofcourse in this you would not exist as a conscious observer being able to move, because you would be of that unity and no seperation would exist. you would be as much on one end as you are the other, but you wouldnt be you in either.

anti-matter exists because mass has density. this is the simplist i can explain this.
R1king is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity