DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**imporrilk** · 11-14-2011, 08:21 PM

i don't see how death could be "the greatest con ever manifested" if it's doing such a poor job tricking people so often...
mark informed us he "doesn't believe in it" period.

you will have to have mark expand upon the position that he "doesn't believe in it" period. from my perspective i do not embrace the 3d trappings and emotionality connected with the transition process we refer to as death. that does not mean that i do not "believe" that the physical body ceases functioning. it simply means the the ritualistic trappings that surrounds 3d death are not relative to the event they surround.

question: as an entity goes through the death process in 3rd density it finds itself in time/space. would you describe that?
ra: in space/time the spatial locations of different material objects, all of which appear in the visual field at the same instant of time, produces a tangible framework for the illusion of space. in time/space the inequity (i.e., the differences perceived?) is upon the shoulders of what you call time. this property renders entities and experiences intangible in a relative sense. correct, the "death process" is a transitioning back to our resident state of space/time. as referenced in a following quote before we each enter into any learn/teach situation for expansion, growth and becoming we choose the lessons that will be the lessons for that particular incursion. whether it is a situation where we utilize a 3d vehicle/existence or a situation where we utilize a 4d vehicle/existence does not matter we enter it after actively participating in planning our own growth exercises and challenges.

question: as this transition continues into 4th density activation, in order to inhabit this 4th density earth it will be necessary for all 3rd density physical bodies to go through the process which we refer to as death. is this correct?
ra: this is correct. [note: this is the most widely misunderstood quote in the law of one series. context reveals that ra is referring to a transmutation, not any type of death as we would normally think of it. this is an ecstatic feeling -- the most incredible moment of any lifetime you've ever had as a human being. i must at this point disagree with you. i have never found in all my years of study of the law of one ever found where ra either lied, misled, or failed to provided a correct response to a question asked. ra had all types of ability to provide a variety of responses that would prevent them from acting in a manner that would be contraindicative of all christ consciousness higher level beings. the question asked is clear and concise "through the process we refer to as death" and leaves little room for misunderstanding. the phrase "through the process we refer to as death" can only mean one thing that is the physical body ceases to function and we transition back to the conscious energy we are. beyond that point it does not mean that i have to transition all the way to space/time but it does mean that i have to "let go of the body". ra then confirms with no equivocation that the statement is an absolute. he did not say it was partially correct nor did he say it was incorrect. if your interpretation is correct then ra committed an act that reveals them as impostors as they would not be positive 6d christ consciousness.

elsewhere ra says you can reconstitute your third-density body after this happens if you so choose -- you simply have to focus on a "more difficult configuration" to get it back. we know this is possible already because of the many reports of those who have witnessed this being done. i will confirm this as being an absolute but it is not something that is routinely done or witnessed.

[continued in the following post]

11-14-2011, 08:21 PM	#7
imporrilk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	i don't see how death could be "the greatest con ever manifested" if it's doing such a poor job tricking people so often... mark informed us he "doesn't believe in it" period. you will have to have mark expand upon the position that he "doesn't believe in it" period. from my perspective i do not embrace the 3d trappings and emotionality connected with the transition process we refer to as death. that does not mean that i do not "believe" that the physical body ceases functioning. it simply means the the ritualistic trappings that surrounds 3d death are not relative to the event they surround. question: as an entity goes through the death process in 3rd density it finds itself in time/space. would you describe that? ra: in space/time the spatial locations of different material objects, all of which appear in the visual field at the same instant of time, produces a tangible framework for the illusion of space. in time/space the inequity (i.e., the differences perceived?) is upon the shoulders of what you call time. this property renders entities and experiences intangible in a relative sense. correct, the "death process" is a transitioning back to our resident state of space/time. as referenced in a following quote before we each enter into any learn/teach situation for expansion, growth and becoming we choose the lessons that will be the lessons for that particular incursion. whether it is a situation where we utilize a 3d vehicle/existence or a situation where we utilize a 4d vehicle/existence does not matter we enter it after actively participating in planning our own growth exercises and challenges. question: as this transition continues into 4th density activation, in order to inhabit this 4th density earth it will be necessary for all 3rd density physical bodies to go through the process which we refer to as death. is this correct? ra: this is correct. [note: this is the most widely misunderstood quote in the law of one series. context reveals that ra is referring to a transmutation, not any type of death as we would normally think of it. this is an ecstatic feeling -- the most incredible moment of any lifetime you've ever had as a human being. i must at this point disagree with you. i have never found in all my years of study of the law of one ever found where ra either lied, misled, or failed to provided a correct response to a question asked. ra had all types of ability to provide a variety of responses that would prevent them from acting in a manner that would be contraindicative of all christ consciousness higher level beings. the question asked is clear and concise "through the process we refer to as death" and leaves little room for misunderstanding. the phrase "through the process we refer to as death" can only mean one thing that is the physical body ceases to function and we transition back to the conscious energy we are. beyond that point it does not mean that i have to transition all the way to space/time but it does mean that i have to "let go of the body". ra then confirms with no equivocation that the statement is an absolute. he did not say it was partially correct nor did he say it was incorrect. if your interpretation is correct then ra committed an act that reveals them as impostors as they would not be positive 6d christ consciousness. elsewhere ra says you can reconstitute your third-density body after this happens if you so choose -- you simply have to focus on a "more difficult configuration" to get it back. we know this is possible already because of the many reports of those who have witnessed this being done. i will confirm this as being an absolute but it is not something that is routinely done or witnessed. [continued in the following post]
	Quote