[excivaamome]

well, this chat seems to be going pretty good.

one thing i have noticed is that the two, hummm... "camps" are starting to bridge now.

for folks who are in the "obama is cool/ helpful pres." camp, there is no conflict with including much of the concept of the others who endorse the "people rising up" camp" (embracing thier own enlightenment/ or otherwise "overwhelming obama with their own love so that that is what he is really projecting out). thanks to the many folks who took the time to write and flesh out their thoughts more.

i mean those two concepts are not really in confict. you could have them both come true, at the same time, and everyone can stand in thier prospective and see their "truth" manifested and it is all/both benficial for man moving along his divine path. yeah!

at this point most "incompatabilities" have been smoothed over:

if we don't have a good leader how do we get to 2012 easily?

my humble opinion is that it does not really matter who is voted the next us president as the world is on a course that cannot be deflected by any one individual.
jim

well, what if obama is evil/ illuminati?

even if obama were evil, he is going to have to positively change america or be heavily scrutinized and suspected of being a evil doer(might even be assassinated). either way, he has no choice but to go positive and change the world for the better.

i don't trust any politicians!

you don't pick a president because you can trust him, especially not in this case; presidents are invariably politicians; and politicians, by their very nature, are undeserving of trust.

vote in your own self-interest. which president is likely to do the least damage?

(do i dare say most of us agree that the pres. who will do the less damage is obama? so still good on non-conflict.)

where am i going with this? i am trying to make everyone on this list sing kumba ya and hold hands in great harmonies of bliss? nice idea, but i am not really aiming so high.

i am trying to get everyone out of everyone else's way.

in otherwords, if your belief/ observation/idea carves out a path to the new world, great. let us co- create without the "but you're doing it wrong" residue. is it necessary for a belief to cancel out other beliefs in order for yours to be true? look, we are all working on multiple fronts to get this thing manifested, so maybe less requiring another positive (leads to the new world) beleif system to be "wrong" in order for yours to be "right". keep it open system. one's understanding of reality need not be threatened by the possible exsitence of someone else's understanding.

take the ego out of the equation and just ask, "is there any possibility, where both of these ideas (which both try to lead to where i want to go) could either one work... any possibility at all?" if there is any possibility at all... bridge it. that means see a scenrio in your head where both of the ideas could work interchangably due to ______ circumstance. trust me, if you will just ask your brain for the suggestions it will come up with them... the mental field is completely designed to link any number of concepts creatively.

so why i am mentioning all this? the possibility of getting two strong beams of light to work with (not against each other, even subconciously) as one much bigger lightbeam, if that is interesting to folks.

a group of people want to bulid a house. one group wants to use wood, the other brick. evetually, some says let's use both, we just want a house. building starts and those who wish to work with wood do so, these who wish to work with brick do so. certain places in the house seem to build better with brick and at other times, better with wood. in the end we have a new house.

with the 50/50 brick and wood house everyone can work with a focused energy together. the brick and wood do not conflict; they wish merely to be used in peace for something good.

lol (lots of love)

darlyne