DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**kertUtire** · 03-24-2009, 05:47 AM

open communication hmm interesting concept its not really allowed on this planet at this time though since we are all suffering from the law of confusion you know divide and conquer ect.

i agree if you look at other humans as different you become isolated and disconnected its almost as if you become a robot or some thing cows and sheep don't seem to have that problem only humans.

we all need a reference point to start from some thing we all have in common greetings human is a good one although some times it might not be applicable namaste is more universal yet not all humans know what that means.
some may say bless you in response but most will say huh most humans know what money is though so maybe humans when they greet should just say money and bow there heads to each other which would mean the money in my pocket respects the money in your pocket but that would only work if both parties both had money in there pockets .

if you did have any money in your pocket and the other human did not you may get confused and see the other human as being other than a human say a bum gutter trash loser ect open communication would automatically cease to function .

if you didn't have money and were hungry or addicted to drugs ect and the other human would not give you money when you asked and called you a bum you may get confused and see the other human as other than human and physically harm the other human as you are feeling pain or hunger and you know the other human doesn't like pain so to communicate that you are feeling pain you inflict it and take the money.

i'm trying to understand your point here. are you saying that all people without any money are harmful to people who do have money. in other words, revert back to barbarianism? if this is the reason for a lack of communication, perhaps it's the people who do have money who have reverted, moreso than the people without. after all, isn't it "you receive back to you what you send for", you draw towards you everything you expect to receive. so, if you greet someone expecting harm, isn't harm what you're asking for?

as far as "namaste", that's a term my mother uses a lot. we're all different. some people don't need words to express themselves or to read another person. sometimes you can look at a passer-by and receive a warmer greeting than than you can from someone you know well baring a huge smile and spouting rhetorical positive salutations and valedictions.

03-24-2009, 05:47 AM	#31
kertUtire Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 392 Senior Member	open communication hmm interesting concept its not really allowed on this planet at this time though since we are all suffering from the law of confusion you know divide and conquer ect. i agree if you look at other humans as different you become isolated and disconnected its almost as if you become a robot or some thing cows and sheep don't seem to have that problem only humans. we all need a reference point to start from some thing we all have in common greetings human is a good one although some times it might not be applicable namaste is more universal yet not all humans know what that means. some may say bless you in response but most will say huh most humans know what money is though so maybe humans when they greet should just say money and bow there heads to each other which would mean the money in my pocket respects the money in your pocket but that would only work if both parties both had money in there pockets . if you did have any money in your pocket and the other human did not you may get confused and see the other human as being other than a human say a bum gutter trash loser ect open communication would automatically cease to function . if you didn't have money and were hungry or addicted to drugs ect and the other human would not give you money when you asked and called you a bum you may get confused and see the other human as other than human and physically harm the other human as you are feeling pain or hunger and you know the other human doesn't like pain so to communicate that you are feeling pain you inflict it and take the money. i'm trying to understand your point here. are you saying that all people without any money are harmful to people who do have money. in other words, revert back to barbarianism? if this is the reason for a lack of communication, perhaps it's the people who do have money who have reverted, moreso than the people without. after all, isn't it "you receive back to you what you send for", you draw towards you everything you expect to receive. so, if you greet someone expecting harm, isn't harm what you're asking for? as far as "namaste", that's a term my mother uses a lot. we're all different. some people don't need words to express themselves or to read another person. sometimes you can look at a passer-by and receive a warmer greeting than than you can from someone you know well baring a huge smile and spouting rhetorical positive salutations and valedictions.
	Quote