Thread
:
Intentional Fallacy
View Single Post
03-13-2009, 02:36 AM
#
14
UvjqTVVC
Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Prabhu Ram
"Wow.
IdhellAm dhaan proof of the pudding-kku appArppattavai"
You explain? My claim 1: Bala probably has no idea how great his films are because he is just good and not conscious of the art/craft aspects.
Answer 1: That is of no concern. All that matters is the film. Pudding matters not the chef (something I clearly agree with in another context)
Answer 2: Snooty of you to doubt Bala when on the other hand.... (Yes,
guilty as charged)
All said and done, when Bala seems to make my claim wobble it makes me glad and this has got nothing to do with his film. So when he makes a statement like "one fails when one tries to prove", I take it as an extremely profound statement about art itself which reveals a certain degree of consciousness about art and craft which thrills me.
The struggle is to keep all this out when judging the work. True. But that does not mean I will just look away and refuse to be impressed by the artist himself. Why not ? I say.
oru maadhiri theLivA kuzhappurEnA ?
Quote
UvjqTVVC
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by UvjqTVVC
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
02:40 AM
.