DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**yespkorg** · 06-04-2012, 03:38 PM

in war as well as in puranas ,taking away wife of the enemy is a sort of vengeance. we can not think any justice in comparing with common citizen. when draupathy herself felt that her husbands lost the control over her & helpless, on what basis she expected pandavas help.she was paying for her foolish act of teasing dhuriyothana during her swayamvaram.If it is the duty of a husband to protect his wife in happiness and sorrow ,it applies to the wife also.
guruvayurappan

I do agree that Draupadi too had a habit of insulting people in the past but even then this insult to her was too much.
All I could say that the Pandavas had NO BAL*S to stand up and defend their wife.

Anyway Lord Krishna showed to Draupadi that in the time of distress we can only 100% depend on God and not anyone else.

06-04-2012, 03:38 PM	#8
yespkorg Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	in war as well as in puranas ,taking away wife of the enemy is a sort of vengeance. we can not think any justice in comparing with common citizen. when draupathy herself felt that her husbands lost the control over her & helpless, on what basis she expected pandavas help.she was paying for her foolish act of teasing dhuriyothana during her swayamvaram.If it is the duty of a husband to protect his wife in happiness and sorrow ,it applies to the wife also. guruvayurappan I do agree that Draupadi too had a habit of insulting people in the past but even then this insult to her was too much. All I could say that the Pandavas had NO BAL*S to stand up and defend their wife. Anyway Lord Krishna showed to Draupadi that in the time of distress we can only 100% depend on God and not anyone else.
	Quote