DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**autoloanexpert** · 11-04-2009, 02:18 PM

A good and successful researcher always does this and leaves the judgement or inferences to the wisdom of the readers. Whatever suits one, may be taken as valid and more acceptable by the person concerned.

This is what I emphasize.

Sir, again am not sure its about picking and choosing things as it 'suits' one.

There is no place for an individual's choice, preference or convenience when any point of research, scientific or historical, is to be validated by proper data.

One cannot expect to see or accept only select works of select historians because that is what one wants to see, and ignore other works with equal or more depth of info. For an overall picture, all sources must be looked into. In case emotions are involved, they need not be accepted. But there is nothing wrong in mentioning them.

11-04-2009, 02:18 PM	#37
autoloanexpert Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 526 Senior Member	A good and successful researcher always does this and leaves the judgement or inferences to the wisdom of the readers. Whatever suits one, may be taken as valid and more acceptable by the person concerned. This is what I emphasize. Sir, again am not sure its about picking and choosing things as it 'suits' one. There is no place for an individual's choice, preference or convenience when any point of research, scientific or historical, is to be validated by proper data. One cannot expect to see or accept only select works of select historians because that is what one wants to see, and ignore other works with equal or more depth of info. For an overall picture, all sources must be looked into. In case emotions are involved, they need not be accepted. But there is nothing wrong in mentioning them.
	Quote