DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**mybooboo** · 04-14-2010, 02:39 AM

I doubt whether 'The Hindu' would have given the same kind of publicity and extent of coverage, had it been 'Joseph Sharma', not 'Joseph Iyengar'.

'The Hindu' has turned so parochial in religious matters, in that they are either anti-Hindu in their approach and attitude (hallmark of secularism) or promoters of only Srivaishnavism. What kind of stance it is?

04-14-2010, 02:39 AM	#27
mybooboo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	I doubt whether 'The Hindu' would have given the same kind of publicity and extent of coverage, had it been 'Joseph Sharma', not 'Joseph Iyengar'. 'The Hindu' has turned so parochial in religious matters, in that they are either anti-Hindu in their approach and attitude (hallmark of secularism) or promoters of only Srivaishnavism. What kind of stance it is?
	Quote