DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Trercakaressy** · 12-22-2008, 04:24 PM

There are many unanswered questions about Indian history and Hinduism. Most of what we know are inferences. Then we have what we called wild theories. Many of the wild theories have been supported by politics. To quote one example I had read a book on " How the ancient Tamils had conquered Polynesia". This was a doctoral thesis of Madras University. Again they had a recent conference on Indus valley Civilization and Tamil. Any non-political historian, archaeologist, anthropologist or Indologist will tell you that the connection is like the connection between Abdul Kader and Amavasya.

May be I should start a thread on the so many unanswered questions about Hinduism.

There is no mention of Eastern India in the Vedic period. Eastern India is a very very late entrant in the Hindu history.

12-22-2008, 04:24 PM	#15
Trercakaressy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 490 Senior Member	There are many unanswered questions about Indian history and Hinduism. Most of what we know are inferences. Then we have what we called wild theories. Many of the wild theories have been supported by politics. To quote one example I had read a book on " How the ancient Tamils had conquered Polynesia". This was a doctoral thesis of Madras University. Again they had a recent conference on Indus valley Civilization and Tamil. Any non-political historian, archaeologist, anthropologist or Indologist will tell you that the connection is like the connection between Abdul Kader and Amavasya. May be I should start a thread on the so many unanswered questions about Hinduism. There is no mention of Eastern India in the Vedic period. Eastern India is a very very late entrant in the Hindu history.
	Quote