DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**jojocomok** · 11-12-2007, 02:17 PM

Whoa! Dear Sri Ram Ji,

I did not post to get you this upset!

Because you were aiming your posting to someone else's posting, saying that that person neither understands Dharma nor the Vedas, I tried to ask you whose posting you are referring to, in what context. If it is one of my postings (I don't know which one) then I plead guilty. I don't know much about Dharma nor Vedas like perhaps yourself.

Postings in a Forum like this elicit responses, to share different points of view. So, I did genuinely ask about something in your posting I did not understand. This took time and effort on my part to read your posting carefully, think about it and craft a response.

Now it is clear, you are targeting your posting only to a certain audience in this Forum. Had I known that, I would not have cared to respond. Now that it is clear, I will not respond to your postings anymore.

I still however hold the view that one must at least directly address someone else's posting, if one says that that person is ignorant!

Having said this, my good wishes to you. No foul, no harm done.

Pranams,
KRS

Dear Sri KRS,

You are more anonymous than me in this forum, after all I use my real name and have at the outset explained why I am posting as 'Ramaa'. Yet we are all two dimensional people with the sacrosanctity of being anonymous! I do not have any special attachment to these IDs in the forums. We just come here to give our views and assimilate others' views that are worth in our opinion. There is no copyright to our postings!

After I have read your postings and mine a couple of times I have come to the conclusion that I have no ability to explain to your satisfaction what I consider my posting as plain and simple. Sorry!

11-12-2007, 02:17 PM	#10
jojocomok Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	Whoa! Dear Sri Ram Ji, I did not post to get you this upset! Because you were aiming your posting to someone else's posting, saying that that person neither understands Dharma nor the Vedas, I tried to ask you whose posting you are referring to, in what context. If it is one of my postings (I don't know which one) then I plead guilty. I don't know much about Dharma nor Vedas like perhaps yourself. Postings in a Forum like this elicit responses, to share different points of view. So, I did genuinely ask about something in your posting I did not understand. This took time and effort on my part to read your posting carefully, think about it and craft a response. Now it is clear, you are targeting your posting only to a certain audience in this Forum. Had I known that, I would not have cared to respond. Now that it is clear, I will not respond to your postings anymore. I still however hold the view that one must at least directly address someone else's posting, if one says that that person is ignorant! Having said this, my good wishes to you. No foul, no harm done. Pranams, KRS Dear Sri KRS, You are more anonymous than me in this forum, after all I use my real name and have at the outset explained why I am posting as 'Ramaa'. Yet we are all two dimensional people with the sacrosanctity of being anonymous! I do not have any special attachment to these IDs in the forums. We just come here to give our views and assimilate others' views that are worth in our opinion. There is no copyright to our postings! After I have read your postings and mine a couple of times I have come to the conclusion that I have no ability to explain to your satisfaction what I consider my posting as plain and simple. Sorry!
	Quote