DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**esanamaserrn** · 08-01-2006, 08:00 AM

Well, I have watched. This movie WAS WAY BETTER AND HAD BETTER WRITING THAT NALA DAMAYANTHI. For more, scroll at ur own risk.

Madhavan deserves kudos for reprising a charcter that isn't easy to do. Yes indeed, screw the bullshit reviews that india said. They'll only understand real movies if "sex" and "nudity" and "sellout"superstar is with them.

NOT EVERTHING is copied FOOLS! 90% of the film is original only 10% is dervived.

08-01-2006, 08:00 AM	#8
esanamaserrn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 475 Senior Member	Well, I have watched. This movie WAS WAY BETTER AND HAD BETTER WRITING THAT NALA DAMAYANTHI. For more, scroll at ur own risk. Madhavan deserves kudos for reprising a charcter that isn't easy to do. Yes indeed, screw the bullshit reviews that india said. They'll only understand real movies if "sex" and "nudity" and "sellout"superstar is with them. NOT EVERTHING is copied FOOLS! 90% of the film is original only 10% is dervived.
	Quote