DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**DINAKuncher** · 09-09-2006, 08:00 AM

Originally Posted by Cinefan Logically should not the director of the Best film also get the best director award?

There are so many aspects to film eg.editing,cinematography,acting,directing etc etc
The best director award goes to a person who did his job(directing) well..which would be visible in the way the actors potray their characters,flow of the movie etc etc.

The best film award should go to a movie which is good overall and there are not too many flaws in the entire movie not just in acting or direction.

This is what I think is the basis of having these 2 seperate categories ..ofcourse it has nothing todo with the announced national awards which according to me is a huge joke.
Saif ali khan best actor

Saif Ali Khan is not a bad actor at all. He has improved greatly since his older films and he was very good in Hum Tum and Kal Ho Na Ho.

09-09-2006, 08:00 AM	#32
DINAKuncher Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 448 Senior Member	Originally Posted by Cinefan Logically should not the director of the Best film also get the best director award? There are so many aspects to film eg.editing,cinematography,acting,directing etc etc The best director award goes to a person who did his job(directing) well..which would be visible in the way the actors potray their characters,flow of the movie etc etc. The best film award should go to a movie which is good overall and there are not too many flaws in the entire movie not just in acting or direction. This is what I think is the basis of having these 2 seperate categories ..ofcourse it has nothing todo with the announced national awards which according to me is a huge joke. Saif ali khan best actor Saif Ali Khan is not a bad actor at all. He has improved greatly since his older films and he was very good in Hum Tum and Kal Ho Na Ho.
	Quote