[xtc2d6u8]

Not necessarily race-based Eugenics, but general objective eugenics focusing on the elimination of genetic diseases, proliferation of highly desirable mental and physical traits and the elimination of certain undesirable personalities or physical traits.

If so, what form of eugenics would you support?

As a side note, I've heard people say racially mixed individuals are stronger, healthier and more attractive. Now I don't really buy into it but if it is indeed the case would a program that supports racial mixing of high quality individuals be the only ethical form of eugenics?

[Siuchingach]

I personally wouldnt support becuz i know some individual is bond to use it in a negative light and confuse the masses. i wouldnt say its all bad, might have some very beneficial outcomes.. As far a the racially mixed people are stronger, healthier and more attractive...absolutely not. It varies from person to person

[Aztegjpl]

I support positive eugenics for my people of course. Not only because it would make them healthier and have lesser chances for diseases, but also to preserve my people and our race.

The hoax about how mixing is better, is just pure liberal bullshit. It is a false propaganda tool which is being used for their corrupted agenda.

Eugenics in China and India is a bit different though. They should promote negative eugenics instead of positive, since these people are way too overpopulated.