Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
This is a half-way hilarious thread title. But if I had anything to say about this, it would be that linguistically and physically, I think one could say Germans VS Swedes is sort of like Japanese VS Thai. The Japanese are more "halted" in the way they express themselves, and people from Thailand are more melodious. Likewise Germans VS Swedes, in a way.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Germans because they fit more the caucasoid spectrum, quite a few swedes have lappid/uralic strains. If the question is who is more white looking refering to who looks more northern in average then the answer would be swedes.
Genotypically or phenotypically? Phenotypically, I would say Swedes. As for genotype, I don't know. I associate Scandinavians and Icelanders with the epitome of whiteness. Not really Germans so much. Im sure bavarians are not as "white" as swedes (using the logic the more northern european the more white that some people seem ti believe.) on average but some groups like east frisians are as blond as swedes and metrically much more extreme caucasians (bigger/sharper noses,longer and narrower faces on average and even probably taller people) |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
No, I wasnt trying to win an argument just stating things that are noticeable. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
why should Germany be considered uniquely 'white'? Its a central European, large country.
Its just legacy of Nazizm, they have this burden on their back, like some racial exam 'oh, German? lets see now how nordic you are yourself, you racist' if Nazizm had never happenned, noone would probably be analysing Germans this way |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|